Cases 11 - 20 of 81
Johnson v. Connections CSP, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00030
Defendant:
Dr. Moen, Connections CSP, Inc. and Ephram Jeon
Plaintiff:
Jonathan S. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Pelzer, Jr. v. Office of Child Support, et al
as 19-3411
Defendant / Appellee:
BEVERLY ROBINSON, 45 C.F.R. 75.2 CONTRACTOR CONFERENCE OFFICER, JOSEPH C. KAMNIK, 45 C.F.R. 75.2 CONTRACT OR DIRECTOR OF TITLE IV-D FRANCHISE, MARGARET T. MURPHY, 45 C.F.R. 75.2 CONTRACTOR ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY M. PELZER, JR.
JOHNSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv19477
Plaintiff:
CLARA S. JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PELZER v. OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT et al
as 2:2019cv03968
Defendant:
OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT, BEVERLY ROBINSON, MARGARET T. MURPHY and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY M. PELZER, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
YOUSCHAK v. JOHNSON
as 3:2018cv00136
Defendant:
MINDI S. JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
TAMMY S. YOUSCHAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAGLIAROLI v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv09585
Petitioner:
KENNETH PAGLIAROLI
Respondent:
STEVEN S. JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Johnson v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
as 17-2429
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID S. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH, UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Brandon Fake v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 17-1173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDON L. FAKE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, KEVIN M. DOUGHERTY, Judge, MARGARET T. MURPHY, Judge and others
DELEON v. JOHNSON
as 1:2016cv08950
Petitioner:
NELSON A. DELEON
Respondent:
STEVEN S. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
