Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv12448
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STATE OF CONNECTICUT et al v. AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv03768
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant:
EMCURE PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD., ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., LANNETT COMPANY, INC. and others
In Re:
STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL LITIGATION
Respondent:
STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL PLAINTIFFS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
STATE OF WISCONSIN et al v. INDIVIOR INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05073
Plaintiff:
STATE OF WISCONSIN , STATE OF ALABAMA , STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant:
INDIVIOR INC. , RECKITTBENCHISER HEALTHCARE (UK) LTD. , INDIVIOR PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. CEPHALON, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv04234
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW YORK , STATE OF OHIO , STATE OF VERMONT and others
Defendant:
CEPHALON, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012mc00065
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Hartford Accident & Indemnity v. Lawrence Fitzpatrick
as 08-3650
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO, Pittsburgh PA, INSURANCE CO OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, CENTURY INDEMNITY CO, as successor to CIGNA Specialty Company, formerly known as California Union Insurance Company and others
Not Yet Classified:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF ASBESTOS CREDITORS, LAWRENCE FITZPATRICK, Legal Representative to the Future Claimants, PHILIP A. PAHIGIAN, Legal Representative to the Future Silica Personal Injury Claimants and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
