Cases 11 - 20 of 34
TUBBS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv16624
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
MONICA TUBBS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson et al v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2020cv00663
Plaintiff:
Joseph Palopoli, Jr., John Toda, Mariano Lorenzo Macaisa and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tubbs v. United States Of America
as 4:2017cv00244
Plaintiff:
Christine Tubbs
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
USA v. Darryl Coleman
as 16-3484
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DARRYL E. COLEMAN, a/k/a T, a/k/a Tubbs, a/k/a D
BRADFORD et al v. BAYER, CORP. et al
as 2:2016cv04081
Plaintiff:
ROSITA BRADFORD , DARRIS BRADFORD , SHAMIKA JACKSON and others
Defendant:
BAYER, CORP., BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC, BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TUBBS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2015cv04564
Plaintiff:
AMIE TUBBS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Darryl Coleman
as 14-3164
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DARRYL E. COLEMAN, a/k/a T a/k/a Tubbs a/k/a D
TUBBS v. MERCK & CO. INC
as 2:2013cv05992
Plaintiff:
CORNELL TUBBS
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Tubb v. United States Of America
as 3:2013cv00322
Plaintiff:
Marcus Tubb
Defendant:
United States Of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MAGZAG v. SYSCO CORPORATION et al
as 5:2012cv05701
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MAGZAG
Defendant:
SYSCO CORPORATION, SYSCO EASTERN MARYLAND LLC, SYSCO PHILADELPHIA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
