Cases 11 - 20 of 74
Banks v. Justices of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court et al
as 1:2020cv00660
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Warden Allegheny County Jail, Hon. Dougherty and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS V TURKEY ET AL
as 2:2020cv00453
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER, SYRIA, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Turkey et al
as 1:2020cv00441
Respondent:
Orlando Harper, Syria, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GHAHARY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv19119
Defendant:
FEDERAL TRANSFER CENTER, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, US MARSHALLS SERVICE US MARSHALLS SERVICE and others
Plaintiff:
DARIUS A GHAHARY and DARIUS F GHAHARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2019cv01169
Respondent:
ASIA YOUNG, DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ORLANDO HARPER and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Banks v. Young et al
as 1:2019cv01237
Defendant:
Asia Young, Warden Orlando Harper, Caitlyn Dickerson and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MICHAELS v. MADDEN et al
as 2:2019cv00207
Defendant:
WESTMORELAND COUNTY JAIL, US MARSHALL PENNSYLVANIA, WESTMORELAND COUNTY COURTHOUSE and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES THOMAS MICHAELS and JAMES THOMAS MICHAELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frank Brett v. Corey Hines, et al
as 17-3580
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
COREY HINES, Federal Court Clerk and US MARSHALL BOSS ANTHONY J UNKNOWN
Brett v. Cruikshank et al
as 1:2017cv01605
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Defendant:
Robert Cruikshank, US Marshall, Bill Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Brett v. Cruikshank et al
as 1:2017mc00300
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Defendant:
Robert Cruikshank, US Marshall, Bill Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
