Cases 11 - 20 of 41
RANSDELL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2015cv07259
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
VINNIE RANSDELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Reigle v. Kovach et al
as 1:2015cv01408
Plaintiff:
Nathan Joseph Reigle
Defendant:
Bruce Kovach, Mark Furguson, Robert Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scicchitano et al v. County of Northumberland et al
as 4:2015cv00852
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Scicchitano , Pamela Bollinger , Robert McAndrew and others
Defendant:
County of Northumberland , Vinny Clausi and Stephen Bridy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Picarella et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv01874
Plaintiff:
Charles Picarella, Jr. and Nathan Reigle
Defendant:
Roy Johnson, Brian Wheary, Robert Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Pierce et al
as 1:2014cv00330
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. West
Defendant:
David Pierce, Vinnie Fabber, Lezley Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUZMAN v. THE MERION CORP. et al
as 1:2014cv00963
Plaintiff:
MIRIAM GUZMAN
Defendant:
THE MERION CORP. and VINNY MAZZELLA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Knapick v. Clausi et al
as 4:2013cv00777
Plaintiff:
William R. Knapick, Sr.
Defendant:
Vinny Clausi , Stephen Bridy and County of Northumberland
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Lamey v. Northumberland County et al
as 4:2013cv00379
Plaintiff:
John Lamey
Defendant:
Northumberland County, Northumberland County Board of Commissioners, Township of Rush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raymond Thornton v. West, et al
as 13-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND E. THORNTON
Defendant - Appellee:
WEST, MUSSER, LAURO B. DIAZ, JR. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
