Cases 11 - 20 of 27
WHITTED v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv01503
Petitioner:
JAMES WHITTED
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
NELSON'S MESSENGER SERVICE, INC. et al v. SOUTH-WHIT SHOPPING CTR. ASSOCIATES
as 2:2014cv04136
Plaintiff:
NELSON'S MESSENGER SERVICE, INC. and ASIAN AMERICAN INSURANCE, INC.
Defendant:
SOUTH-WHIT SHOPPING CTR. ASSOCIATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Whitted v. President United States of Ame, et al
as 14-2706
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES WHITTED
Defendant:
PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN LORETTO FCI
KMART CORPORATION v. SOUTH-WHIT SHOPPING CENTER ASSOC. et al
as 2:2014cv00975
Plaintiff:
KMART CORPORATION
Defendant:
SOUTH-WHIT SHOPPING CENTER ASSOC., WILBUR F. BRESLIN ASSOCIATES, WHITMAN PLAZA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. James Whitted
as 14-1037
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES WHITTED, a/k/a MOHAMED
WHITTED v. PRES. B. OBAMA et al
as 3:2013cv00278
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD WHITTED
Respondent:
PRES. B. OBAMA, E. HOLDER and M. KIRBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WHITTED v. CITY OF PLEASANTVILLE et al
as 1:2013cv07316
Plaintiff:
JALAL WHITTED
Defendant:
CITY OF PLEASANTVILLE, ANGEL VALENTIN, JOHN PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. James Whitted
as 13-2321
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES WHITTED
WHITTED v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv02930
Plaintiff:
JAMES WHITTED
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
WHITTED et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63696
Plaintiff:
HOWARD LEE WHITTED and IVA BALDWIN WHITTED
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION, OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
