Cases 21 - 30 of 76
WILLIAMS v. RISOLDI'S AUTOMOTIVE et al
as 1:2020cv09404
Defendant:
SERGEANT RYAN MCHUGH, CORRECTIONS OFFICER K. CAIN, DETECTIVE BRANDON WHITHAM and others
Plaintiff:
RUFUS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIPIETRO et al v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2019cv05959
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
LINDA DIPIETRO, MARK DIPIETRO, MARK DEPIETRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Peter DiPietro
as 19-3322
Not Yet Classified:
PROSECUTOR CAMDEN COUNTY, MICHELLE VERNO, Judge, SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
In re: Peter DiPietro
as 19-3323
Not Yet Classified:
PROSECUTOR CAMDEN COUNTY, MICHELLE VERNO, Judge, SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Peter DiPietroIn re: Peter DiPietro
as 19-3227
Not Yet Classified:
PROSECUTOR CAMDEN COUNTY, MICHELLE VERNO, Judge, SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Peter DiPietroIn re: Peter DiPietro
as 19-3228
Not Yet Classified:
PROSECUTOR CAMDEN COUNTY, MICHELLE VERNO, Judge, SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
In re: Peter DiPietro
as 19-3039
Respondent:
WARDEN CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN BURLINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and WARDEN SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Not Yet Classified:
NOEL L. HILLMAN
Petitioner:
In re: PETER DIPIETRO
In re: Peter DiPietro
as 19-3040
Not Yet Classified:
NOEL L. HILLMAN
Respondent:
MATTHEW LEITH, Warden of the County Correctional Facility
Petitioner:
In re: PETER DIPIETRO
DIPIETRO v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2019cv17014
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, BURLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTEN MANDELA and others
Plaintiff:
PETER DIPIETRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HMC INCORPORATED et al v. COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv03285
Plaintiff:
KARA DIPIETRO and HMC INCORPORATED
Defendant:
FAST ADVANCE FUNDING, INC. and COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
