Cases 21 - 30 of 10,957
Sandra RumanekIn re: Sandra Rumanek
as 24-1634
Petitioner:
In re: SANDRA RUMANEK and DR. OLGA A. KATZ
Respondent:
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL MANAGEMENT INC, SHERRY R. FALLON, DAVID G. CULLEY and others
CLARK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv04732
Plaintiff:
MARY KIM CLARK
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CLARK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv04732
Plaintiff:
MARY KIM CLARK
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CLARK v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04641
Petitioner:
WILLIAM CLARK
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CLARK v. RED & BLUE DICE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv01386
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA CLARK
Defendant:
RED & BLUE DICE CORPORATION, RED & BLUE DICE 2 CORPORATION and AZHARUL ISLAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Clark v. Haynes International, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
John Clark
Defendant:
Haynes International, Inc., Robert H. Getz, Michael L. Shor and others
Ronald ClarkIn re: Ronald Clark
as 24-1553
Petitioner:
In re: RONALD CLARK
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor:
TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
CLARKE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv03988
Petitioner:
ANDREW F. CLARKE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RAMZIDDIN v. ONOFRI et al
as 3:2024cv03958
Plaintiff:
ABUSSAMAA RASUL RAMZIDDIN
Defendant:
ANGELO J. ONOFRI, ESQ., HEATHER HADLEY, ESQ., SERGEANT NATISCHA CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
