Cases 21 - 30 of 119
ALOIA CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. v. HALBERSTADT CURLEY, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv06267
Plaintiff:
ALOIA CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
Defendant:
HALBERSTADT CURLEY, LLC , CHARLES V. CURLEY , KELLE A. KILGARRIFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CULP et al v. NFL PRODUCTIONS LLC et al
as 1:2013cv04999
Plaintiff:
CURLEY CULP , JOHN RIGGINS , RON YARY and others
Defendant:
NFL PRODUCTIONS LLC and NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Kareem Greene v. Michael Curley, et al
as 13-2067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREEM ALI GREENE
Defendant:
MICHAEL CURLEY, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant - Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY
Keith Washington v. Michael Curley, et al
as 13-2014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CURLEY, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Henry Stubbs, III v. Michael Curley, et al
as 13-1894
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY CHRISTOPHER STUBBS, III
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CURLEY, Warden at MCF and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Richard Parker v. Michael Curley, et al
as 12-4309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN MICHAEL CURLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
LEPRE v. SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY CHILDREN & YOUTH SERVICES et al
as 2:2012cv01658
Plaintiff:
GERALD S. LEPRE, JR.
Defendant:
SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY CHILDREN & YOUTH SERVICES, SUSAN ADAMEC, DEANA WASKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. The Pennsylvania State University et al
as 4:2012cv02068
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
The Pennsylvania State University, The Second Mile, Edgewater Psychiatric Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Ricky Whitney v. Curley, et al
as 12-38363
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY WHITNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN CURLEY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
