Cases 21 - 30 of 91
HINES v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04858
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Petitioner:
DICKEY HINES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PHILLIPS v. LOVE et al
as 2:2020cv01273
Defendant:
EDWARD E. LOVE and NEW PRIME, INC.
Plaintiff:
DICKEY PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EZERINS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv00541
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DICKEY and MARA EZERINS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILAS v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2019cv00313
Defendant:
CERT. OFF. JAMES, RAYMOND BURKEHART, DERINA VARNER and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES MILAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
Shavez HoldenIn re: Shavez Holden
as 19-2687
Not Yet Classified:
SGT. KOPCHICK, C.O. 2, S.C.I. Forest, In re: SHAWVEZ NELSON A/K/A SHAVEZ HOLDEN, ZACHARY J. MOSLAK, Chief Hearing Examiner and others
DICKEY v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv13278
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
DONNIE DICKEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rhonshawn Jackson v. Carter, et al
as 19-2010
Defendant / Appellee:
GILARA, HAGGERTY, CARTER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RHONSHAWN JACKSON
AFENDOULES et al v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 3:2019cv09291
Plaintiff:
JAMES PARTRIDGE, BARBARA DENTON, JAMES SMITH and others
Defendant:
JANSSEN ORTHO, LLC, BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC, BAYER AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AFENDOULES et al v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 2:2019cv09291
Plaintiff:
JAMES PARTRIDGE, BARBARA DENTON, JAMES SMITH and others
Defendant:
JANSSEN ORTHO, LLC, BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC, BAYER AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ATANACIO-REYES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv00275
Defendant:
SKILMAN, Lt. DICKEY, SCOTT RIDDLE and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS ATANACIO-REYES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
