Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00812
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02418
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
REYES-DILONE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2013cv00105
Plaintiff: LUIS OSCAR REYES-DILONE
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and DEPARTMENT OF I.C.E.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01428
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Habulembe v. U.S. Attorney General et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00335
Petitioner: Chuundu Mooba Habulembe
Respondent: U.S. Attorney General , U.S. Secretary of DHS , I.C.E. Field Office Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv02005
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James v. Dept. of Homeland Security I.C.E.
as 3:2011cv05793
Petitioner: Oneil Garfield James
Respondent: Dept. of Homeland Security I.C.E.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LAOYE v. D.H.S. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv01969
Plaintiff: AKINTOYE LAOYE
Defendant: D.H.S., I.C.E., OFFICER JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROWANN v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2011cv00360
Petitioner: GEORGE M. ROWANN
Respondent: BRIAN V. COLEMAN and BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT (I.C.E.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NGUYEN v. WARDEN KIRBY et al
as 1:2010cv04525
Petitioner: PHUONG THANH NGUYEN
Respondent: WARDEN KIRBY and I.C.E.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?