Cases 21 - 30 of 70
ALLIANCE LIFE SCIENCES CONSULTING GROUP, INC. v. FABRICZI et al
as 2:2017cv00864
Plaintiff:
ALLIANCE LIFE SCIENCES CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
LASZLO FABRICZI and QUINTILES IMS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Bayer Intellectual Property GMBH et al v. The Hartz Mountain Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00175
Plaintiff:
Bayer Intellectual Property GMBH, Bayer Healthcare LLC and Bayer Animal Health GmbH
Defendant:
The Hartz Mountain Corporation and CAP IM Supply, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
QUINTILES IMS INCORPORATED et al v. VEEVA SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2017cv00177
Plaintiff:
QUINTILES IMS INCORPORATED and IMS SOFTWARE SERVICES, LTD.
Defendant:
VEEVA SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
GONZALES v. IM, LLC
as 2:2016cv06084
Plaintiff:
HECTOR GONZALES
Defendant:
IM, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VZW WIRELESS CORP et al v. WINSOME PAGING, INC.
as 2:2016cv03043
Plaintiff:
VZW WIRELESS CORP and EUN IM LIM
Defendant:
WINSOME PAGING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IMS HEALTH INFORMATION SOLUTIONS USA LLC v. LEMPERNESSE
as 2:2015cv07561
Plaintiff:
IMS HEALTH INFORMATION SOLUTIONS USA LLC
Defendant:
BRUNO LEMPERNESSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IMES v. WINGARD et al
as 3:2015cv00242
Plaintiff:
TOSHMINGO H. IMES
Defendant:
TREVOR A. WINGARD, DANIEL J. GEALMANN, C. WADSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TUBE CITY IMS, LLC v. MUELLER et al
as 2:2015cv00929
Plaintiff:
TUBE CITY IMS, LLC
Defendant:
DETLEF MUELLER and U.S. FERROUS TRADING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
