Cases 21 - 30 of 125
BELOUS v. GANNON, et al
as 2:2019cv06186
Defendant:
ILYA BELOUS, Sergeant JOHN DOE DAVIDSECK, Dr. JOHN DOE AND NURSES JANE DOE 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv15173
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KMAN v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv00745
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. KMAN, JR.
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD et al
as 2:2018cv08240
Plaintiff:
NAOMI JOHNSON
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD, TOWNSHIP OF BLOOMFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, ROBERT ESTELLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUFFY v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2017cv03083
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TUFFY
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO , JEFFREY WALKER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parness v. Hort et al
as 2:2017cv04029
Plaintiff:
MARTIN S. PARNESS
Defendant:
MICHAEL HORT, SUSAN HORT, JOHN DOES 1-75 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURRAY et al v. COUNTY OF HUDSON et al
as 2:2017cv02875
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MURRAY , PATRICIA AIKEN and EDPDLAW, LTD.
Defendant:
COUNTY OF HUDSON, HUDSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, THOMAS A. DEGISE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TENAGLIA et al v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
DAVID TENAGLIA
Defendant:
THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JEFFREY WALKER, MICHAEL SPICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv08601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
