Cases 21 - 30 of 299
Smith v. May et al
as 1:2022cv00544
Petitioner:
Leroy L. Smith
Respondent:
Robert May, Kathleen Jennings and David Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WATERMAN v. INTRICON CORP. et al
as 2:2022cv01541
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
INTRICON CORP., PHILIP L SMITH, Nicholas A. Giordano and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Sandoval v. Intricon Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv01512
Plaintiff:
Lisa Sandoval
Defendant:
Intricon Corporation, Nicholas A. Giordano, Raymond Huggenberger and others
Linda Wright v. USA, et al
as 22-1164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA ANN WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF TEXAS and others
Defendant:
ARBORS REHABILITATION, -TEXAS, DEXTER GOEI, LONE TREE CONVALESCENT and others
WHITFIELD v. ACCELERON PHARMA INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04628
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
ACCELERON PHARMA INC., FRANCOIS NADER, HABIB DABLE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Wilson v. Acceleron Pharma Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01473
Plaintiff:
Jordan Wilson
Defendant:
Acceleron Pharma Inc., Habib J. Dable, Terrence C. Kearney and others
MCINTYRE-JOHN et al v. BEAM et al
as 2:2021cv01433
Plaintiff:
HOLLY MCINTYRE-JOHN, PAUL NEUBECKER, CHRISTY CAMPBELL and others
Defendant:
ALISON BEAM, SHERRI L. SMITH and UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GITTENS v. PEPPER et al
as 1:2021cv17348
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Defendant:
RYAN PEPPER, RAIMON NG, JONATHAN P. GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Moss et al
as 3:2021cv01416
Plaintiff:
Jermaine L. Smith
Defendant:
J. Moss and S. Gavlick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burk v. Wakefield et al
as 4:2021cv01354
Plaintiff:
Ishmael A. Burk
Defendant:
Superintendent Wakefield, Corrections Officer Cassol, Corrections Officer Hann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
