Cases 21 - 30 of 44
TOLLHOUSE INVESTMENTS, LLC v. LAU et al
as 2:2016cv05665
Plaintiff:
TOLLHOUSE INVESTMENTS, LLC
Defendant:
STEVEN E. LAU , FRANK DELUCA , EDWARD KANG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-2221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3 G WIRELESS, INC et al v. METRO PCS PENNSYLVANIA, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv06319
Plaintiff:
3 G WIRELESS, INC , JOSEPH CHO , ELITE MOBILE, INC and others
Defendant:
METRO PCS PENNSYLVANIA, LLC, JOHN SHELTON, LOUIS PELTZER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv06413
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Nottenkamper v. Modany et al
as 1:2014cv00672
Plaintiff:
Janice Nottenkamper
Defendant:
Kevin M. Modany, Daniel M. Fitzpatrick, John F. Cozzi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TOTH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2014cv00014
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN A. TOTH
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT LAUREL HIGHLANDS, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
DIETZ v. GAVIOLA et al
as 2:2013cv04177
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DIETZ
Defendant:
GERRY GAVIOLA, SUSAN ROCA, STEVEN STERN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED-LAU v. MCNEIL-PPC, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv01038
Plaintiff:
SHELLY LYNN REED-LAU
Defendant:
MCNEIL-PPC, INC. , MCNEIL CONSUMER HEALTHCARE DIVISION OF MCNEIL-PPC, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LAU v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56816
Plaintiff:
HARRY LAU
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LAU v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv57129
Plaintiff:
KAM Y. LAU
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
