Cases 21 - 30 of 508
BROWN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2023cv00070
Petitioner:
NIARE LAMAR BROWN
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, WARDEN OF SCI LAUREL HIGHLANDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODWARD et al v. DOE et al
as 1:2023cv01616
Plaintiff:
SHAWN A. WOODWARD and RONALD D. JOHNSON
Defendant:
MIKE DOE, JOHN DOE, LAMAR FARMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
FLETCHER v. VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.
as 2:2023cv00977
Plaintiff:
Lamar Genie Fletcher
Defendant:
VisionQuest National, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Parker v. Kyper et al
as 1:2023cv00383
Plaintiff:
Donte Lamar Parker
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Kyper and Correctional Officer Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamar Haymes v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 23-1266
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMAR HAYMES
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY
Gurdine v. Mason et al
as 1:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Lamar Gurdine
Defendant:
Bernadette Mason, Jeanne Macknight and Benjamin Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Dejon Clark v. Howard Harcha, III, et al
as 23-1226
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEJON LAMAR CHRISTOPH CLARK
Defendant:
HOWARD H. HARCHA, III, ANTHONY BLINKEN, ANDREW SAUL and others
USA v. Lamar Brown
as 23-1221
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LAMAR BROWN
Lamar v. Barraza
as 3:2023cv00202
Petitioner:
Anson Lamar
Respondent:
Warden Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
