Cases 21 - 30 of 106
BURLEY v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2021cv00300
Petitioner:
KEITH LAMONT BURLEY, JR.
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OBERLANDER, ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO, JOSHUA D. LAMANCUSA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HISEL v. LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS
as 2:2021cv00980
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. HISEL
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HISEL v. LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00935
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. HISEL
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS and PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HISEL v. LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTONS
as 2:2021cv00934
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. HISEL
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LAWRENCE COUNTY CAREER & TECHNICAL CENTER v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00707
Defendant:
JAMES MONSEES, ADAM BOWEN, RIAZ VALANI and others
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE COUNTY CAREER & TECHNICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Samuel Webster v. Jodi Klabon-Esoldo, et al
as 21-1872
Defendant / Appellee:
JODI KLABON-ESOLDO, in her official capacity as Prothonotary of Lawrence County, Pennsylvania and LAWRENCE COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL T. WEBSTER, individually and as representative of the class
Keith Burley, Jr. v. Joshua Lamancusa, et al
as 21-1342
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL VOGLER, DOMINICK MOTTO, MORGAN BOYD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH LAMONT BURLEY, JR.
HISEL v. LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. HISEL
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS and PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LOWRY v. TICE et al
as 2:2021cv00083
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and LAWRENCE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Petitioner:
SAMUEL LEE LOWRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
