Cases 21 - 30 of 140
MUNROE v. VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.
as 2:2023cv00752
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS MUNROE
Defendant:
VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
McNair v. Spaulding
as 3:2022cv02059
Petitioner:
Marquis McNair
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Marquis WilsonIn re: Marquis Wilson
as 22-3101
Petitioner:
In re: MARQUIS WILSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DIXON v. CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK et al
as 3:2022cv05994
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS M. DIXON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK and MIDDLESEX COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brabham v. Owens et al
as 1:2022cv01186
Plaintiff:
Jaquan Marqui Brabham
Defendant:
David Owens, Virginia Hobbs, Trooper Wilker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Marquis Wilson v. USA
as 22-1940
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARQUIS WILSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Erskine et al v. Mears et al
as 1:2022cv00381
Plaintiff:
Justin Erskine, Lateef Dickerson, Matthew Hoskins and others
Defendant:
Truman Mears, Joseph Beck, Marvella Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLLAND et al v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01348
Plaintiff:
TRACEY HOLLAND, VIRGINIA ERB MARQUIS and DON ROWLETT
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Marquis Ramey v. Superintendent Benner Township SCI, et al
as 22-1410
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARQUIS RAMEY
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT BENNER TOWNSHIP SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
