Cases 21 - 30 of 243
Saez et al v. Hudock et al
as 1:2021cv00290
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, Michael Piecuch, John A. Zechman and others
Petitioner:
Ralph Saez and Helen Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abt v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2021cv00172
Defendant:
Cesar Conde, Michael T. Duke, James W. Breyer and others
Nominal Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Manuel Abt
GWALDIS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2021cv01952
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T GWALDIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Butcher-Weber et al v. Newell Brands Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01792
Defendant:
Ian G.H. Ashken, Raymond G. Viault, Bradford R. Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie R. Butcher-Weber and Larry R. Weber
Nominal Defendant:
Newell Brands Inc.
Trimarco v. Farley et al
as 1:2020cv01408
Defendant:
Shawn Patrick Carden, Ashish Kapoor, Michael A. Hilmer and others
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Trimarco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pieczynski v. Rogers et al
as 3:2020cv01849
Defendant:
J. Jennifer L. Rogers, Tina Gartley, Michael T. Quinn and others
Plaintiff:
Paul A Pieczynski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stein v. BMC Stock Holdings, Inc., et al
as 1:2020cv01364
Defendant:
David W. Bullock, James O. Leary, David L. Keltner and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES, INC. v. SMITH, JR. et al
as 2:2020cv13342
Defendant:
MICHAEL T. SMITH, JR., DUFF INSURANCE BROKERAGE, INC., HEALTH ADVISORS OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Petitioner:
EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES, INC.
Interested Party:
iThreat Cyber Group, Inc.
v. SMITH, JR. et al
as 2:2020cv13341
Defendant:
MICHAEL T. SMITH, JR., DUFF INSURANCE BROKERAGE, INC., HEALTH ADVISORS OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Conklin v. Harley-Davidson Motor Company et al
as 3:2020cv01712
Defendant:
Harley-Davidson Motor Company and Harley-Davidson, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Conklin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
