Cases 21 - 30 of 48
MORIN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2013cv05434
Plaintiff:
FRANK A. MORIN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
THOMAS E. LACHKOVICH v. BUSH et al
as 1:2013cv00089
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THOMAS E. LACHKOVICH
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH, MARK SULLIVAN, RICHARD CHENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
MELO et al v. AMS SERVICING, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv01807
Plaintiff:
DENNIS F. MELO , MONIQUE ALBORNOZ , REGINA AMANKULOR and others
Defendant:
AMS SERVICING, LLC , BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. , BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
MORIN v. CROSSMARK, INC.
as 2:2013cv00841
Plaintiff:
SHIOBHAN MORIN
Defendant:
CROSSMARK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
MORIN v. HOBOKEN BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 2:2013cv00591
Plaintiff:
PINO MORIN
Defendant:
HOBOKEN BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mark V. Morin v. 20/20 Companies, et al
as 12-3884
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK V. MORIN
Defendant - Appellee:
20/20 COMPANIES, VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC, JOSHUA MICHAEL FANELLI and others
MORIN v. SMITH
as 1:2011cv00249
Plaintiff:
TONY MORIN
Defendant:
MAJOR SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GONZALEZ et al v. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv02142
Plaintiff:
MANUEL GONZALEZ , MICHELLE CAMPBELL , KAUSTUV DATTA and others
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC. and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
