Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
CARUANA et al v. KILMURRAY et al
as 3:2013cv04286
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO CARUANA , ALLEN FREEMAN , PETER STOBIERSKI and others
Defendant:
ROBERT KILMURRAY , EDWARD BOBAL , RICHARD POGORZELSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. BROCADO et al
as 1:2013cv01133
Plaintiff:
REGINAL LEE DAVIS
Defendant:
PETER BROCADO, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PROSECUTOR'S AND PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORAN v. PICKERING MANOR HOME et al
as 2:2013cv00808
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA MORAN
Defendant:
PICKERING MANOR HOME and ALICE NARLIS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Pickering-George v. United States Attorneys Office et al
as 1:2013cv00126
Plaintiff:
John Pickering-George
Defendant:
United States Attorneys Office, Department of Justice, National Archives and Records Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PICKERING et al v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
as 3:2012cv07111
Plaintiff:
LINDA PICKERING and GEORGE PICKERING
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
John Pickering-George v. USDC MDPA, et al
as 12-3793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN T. PICKERING-GEORGE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNITED STATES AGENCY and UNITED STATES OFFICIAL COURTS JUDICIAL SYSTEM, Official Capacity
Christ the King Manor Inc, et al v. Secretary United States Depart, et al
as 12-3746
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHRIST THE KING MANOR INC, BALDOCK ASSOCIATES, d/b/a Presque Isle Rhabilitation & Nursing Center, BONHAM NURSING CENTER, d/b/a Presque Isle Rhabilitation & Nursing Center and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PERINI SERVICE SOUTHHAMPTON MANOR, d/b/a Shippingsburg Health Care Center
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CHARLENE FRIZZERA, in her official capacity as Acting Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and HARRIET DICHTER, in her officail capacity as Secretary of Public welfare for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare
Christ the King Manor Inc v. Secretary United States Depart
as 12-3501
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHRIST THE KING MANOR INC, BONHAM NURSING CENTER, BRIARLEAF NURSING AND CONVALESCENT CENTER INC and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BALDOCK ASSOCIATES, d/b/a Baldock Health Care Center and HUMBERT LANE ASSSOCIATES, d/b/a Humbert Lane Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CHARLENE FRIZZERA, in her official capacity as Acting Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and HARRIET DICHTER, in her officail capacity as Secretary of Public welfare for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare
Christ the King Manor Inc v. Secretary US Department of Hea
as 12-3401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRIST THE KING MANOR INC
Plaintiff - Numerous Parties See Appellant:
BALDOCK ASSOCIATES, d/b/a Baldock Health Care Center, BONHAM NURSING CENTER, BRIARLEAF NURSING AND CONVALESCENT CENTER CENTER INC and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HUMBERT LANE ASSSOCIATES, d/b/a Humbert Lane Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, JEWISH HOME OF GREATER HARRISBURG, MISERICORDIA CONVALESCENT HOME and others
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellant:
WINDSOR INC, d/b/a Snyder Memorial Health Care Center
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CHARLENE FRIZZERA, in her official capacity as Acting Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and HARRIET DICHTER, in her officail capacity as Secretary of Public welfare for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
