Cases 21 - 30 of 73
RAWLINGS v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2019cv04698
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER WALSH, P/O JOHN DOES #1-30, SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH RAWLINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Wolff v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 4:2019cv01596
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company and The Rawlings Company
Plaintiff:
Joanne Wolff
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
RAWLS v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2019cv01859
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, ROBERT GILMORE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
SAMEECH RAWLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SPENCE et al v. PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT (M.D.PA.) et al
as 5:2018cv05277
Defendant:
THOMAS DARR, PENNSYLVANIA SUPREM COURT (E.D.PA.), C.J. THOMAS SAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE MITCHELL, ANTHONY LYONS, AESHA LYONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAWLS v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 2:2018cv05039
Plaintiff:
RICKY RAWLS
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
RAWLS v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2017cv00617
Plaintiff:
REGINA RAWLS
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv05900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
RAWLS v. GIBBS et al
as 2:2016cv01438
Plaintiff:
SAMEECH RAWLS
Defendant:
GIBBS, MICHAEL GUYTON, ROBERT D. GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
