Cases 21 - 30 of 49
SCOTT v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv15177
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCOTT
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCOTT v. CHESWICK BOROUGH, PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2018cv00847
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCOTT
Defendant:
CHESWICK BOROUGH, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Scott v. USA
as 1:2016cv01364
Petitioner:
Robert Scott, Sr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Margeson v. Scott
as 4:2016cv00384
Plaintiff:
Lance Margeson
Defendant:
Robert Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Robert Scott, Sr.
as 15-3126
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT SCOTT, SR., a/k/a Big Rob
Robert Scott v. Superintendent Mercer SCI, et al
as 14-4560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MERCER SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHAMPTON COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv06374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4463
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fadden v. Rozum
as 3:2013cv01728
Petitioner:
Robert Scott Fadden
Respondent:
Gerald Rozum and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) v. THE CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK et al
as 3:2013cv01557
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, PHILIP DUCHESNEAU, ROBERT SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
