Cases 21 - 30 of 174
Romeo v. Internetwork Expert, LLC
as 1:2020cv00610
Plaintiff:
Armando Romeo
Defendant:
Internetwork Expert, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JONES et al v. ARTKAN, INC.
as 5:2020cv00882
Plaintiff:
INA SCHNITZER, DENISE MILANI, CIELO JEAN GIBSON and others
Defendant:
ARTKAN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FORTIN et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05172
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
AIDA E FORTIN and ROMEO FORTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01555
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DOTTLE v. ESSAD, II et al
as 2:2019cv00776
Plaintiff:
JONI DOTTLE
Defendant:
SHANNON ROMEO and JERALD C. ESSAD, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
SOUZA et al v. CONTROVERSY, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00691
Plaintiff:
JAIME EDMONDSON-LONGORIA, BROOKE JOHNSON, ALANA MARIE SOUZA and others
Defendant:
CONTROVERSY, LLC and MARK LATORRE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
GJERGJI et al v. LOWER BUCKS COUNTY JOINT MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2019cv01276
Defendant:
VIJAY S. RAJPUT and LOWER BUCKS COUNTY JOINT MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY
Plaintiff:
ROMEO GJERGJI and ISLAM GJERGJI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLEAVES v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2019cv01724
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION, GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (US) LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROMEO CLEAVES
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ACOSTA et al v. HIGHWAY ENTERTAINMENT et al
as 2:2018cv17725
Defendant:
DELILAH'S DEN ATLANTIC CITY, XSCAPE GOGO, PROPERTIES 40 BRIGHTON, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RHIAN SUGDEN, PAOLA CANAS, MEGAN DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
