Cases 21 - 30 of 33
MCKINNEY v. FITZGERALD et al
as 3:2018cv12987
Defendant:
ROBERT CHERTERKIN, ANTHONY CAMPOS, OFFICER FORBES and others
Plaintiff:
IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKINNEY v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2018cv08618
Plaintiff:
IVAN MCKINNEY
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN, BAEZ, BECKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MCMILLAN v. HUGHES et al
as 1:2017cv13435
Plaintiff:
LARRY MCMILLAN
Defendant:
C. RAY HUGHES, SGT. JOHN DOE #1, SCO JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. C.O. Covington et al
as 1:2017cv02309
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Clark
Defendant:
C.O. Covington, Sgt. John Doe, Sgt. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. SUPERINTENDANT SCI-PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2017cv00455
Plaintiff:
RODGER WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT SCI-PITTSBURGH, LT. JANE DOE and SGT. JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOWRY v. FARLEY et al
as 2:2017cv00868
Plaintiff:
SHARRON WILLIAM LOWRY
Defendant:
MICHAEL FARLEY, SGT. JOHN DOE, ABINGTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2016cv01068
Plaintiff:
DAVID S. JOHNSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH, UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GEARY v. SGT. JOHN DOE et al
as 3:2014cv00106
Plaintiff:
TYRONE GEARY
Defendant:
SGT. JOHN DOE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER COUTTS, DAVID ONSTEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARRETT v. LINDSAY et al
as 2:2013cv02874
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ALI GARRETT
Defendant:
CAMERON LINDSAY, FELTON, ATKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv04557
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. EVANS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, GLENN J. CONWAY, P/O JOHN DOE#'S 1 TO 7 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
