Cases 21 - 30 of 66
SHIPMAN v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv06629
Plaintiff:
ROBIN R SHIPMAN
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHIPMAN v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2018cv00745
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH SHIPMAN
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHIPMAN et al v. AQUATHERM L.P. et al
as 2:2017cv05416
Plaintiff:
GAIL SHIPMAN , ROY SHIPMAN, III and JUSTIN SHIPMAN
Defendant:
AQUATHERM L.P., N.H. YATES AND COMPANY, INC. and LANDSTAR RANGER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
D'Rayfield Shipman v. Veterans Administration, et al
as 17-2051
Plaintiff - Appellant:
D'RAYFIELD KARY-KHAME SHIPMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
VETERANS ADMINISTRATION and DISABLED AMERICAN VETERAN
SHIPMAN v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 3:2016cv08727
Plaintiff:
TERRI SHIPMAN
Defendant:
BAYER CORPORATION and BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SHIPMAN v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00497
Plaintiff:
THERESA SHIPMAN
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHIPMAN v. VETERAN'S ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2016cv00426
Plaintiff:
D'RAYIELD KARY-KHAME SHIPMAN
Defendant:
VETERAN'S ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BACON v. LANGFORD et al
as 2:2015cv05146
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE BACON
Defendant:
LANGFORD, ASSISTANT WARDEN, PHILIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis Shipman v. Alicia Brook
as 15-2162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS SHIPMAN, on behalf of his minor child K.S.
Defendant - Appellee:
ALICIA ALI BROOKS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
