Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Peter Ponzini, et al v. Monroe County, et al
as 17-3133
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PETER PONZINI and MIRYEM BARBAROS, as Co-Administrators of the Estate of Mumun Barbaros, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
MONROE COUNTY, WARDEN DONNA ASURE, RICHARD CUTH and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PRIMECARE MEDICAL INC, CHRISTINA ROWE, PATRICIA BAUER and others
TALBERT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv04264
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, E. BROWN, D. T. THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peter Ponzini, et al v. Monroe County, et al
as 17-2921
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER PONZINI and MIRYEM BARBAROS, as Co-Administrators of the Estate of Mumun Barbaros, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
MONROE COUNTY, WARDEN DONNA ASURE, RICHARD CUTH and others
Alley v. Baker et al
as 1:2017cv00590
Plaintiff:
Robert Alley
Defendant:
S. Baker, K. McMillan and T. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS et al v. LOWE et al
as 2:2017cv02004
Plaintiff:
THOMAS T. THOMAS and ANNA THOMAS
Defendant:
AMARA CARESSE LOWE and ALL OCCUPANTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Debra Alexander v. Monroe County, et al
as 17-1801
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEBRA L. ALEXANDER, adoptive parent and Administratix of the Estate of Scott Alonzo Alexander
Defendant - Appellee:
MONROE COUNTY, DONNA ASURE, individually and officially as Warden of Monroe County Correctional Facility, JAMES LANDON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
THOMAS v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv06163
Plaintiff:
BOOKER T. THOMAS
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawford v. While et al
as 1:2014cv01682
Plaintiff:
Antonio R. Crawford
Defendant:
While, Shermon, Debra Mink and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
