Cases 21 - 30 of 1,386
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1336
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER OPERATIONS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BROWN v. ODDO et al
as 2:2024cv00226
Petitioner:
MARVIN LYLE BROWN
Respondent:
WARDEN LEMAR ODDO, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DALNOKY v. CATONA
as 1:2024cv00961
Plaintiff:
PAUL B. DALNOKY
Defendant:
TONY CATONA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
PARRISH v. GREUNER et al
as 2:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA D PARRISH
Defendant:
DAVID GREUNER, M.D., ADAM TONIS, CHARLES H STARK, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
CUNNINGHAM v. GARLAND et al
as 3:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
ALEJANDRO CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
DHS SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND, MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nasr v. McKinnon et al
as 1:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Tony F. Nasr
Defendant:
Todd McKinnon, Brett J. Tighe, Frederick Kerrest and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
