Cases 31 - 40 of 826
CASTRO-MOTA v. GALLAGHER et al.
as 2:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA and SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant:
MR. GALLAGHER, CO OFFICER and SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CASTRO-MOTA v. CLARK et al.
as 2:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA and SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant:
TERREA CLARK, WARDEN TERREA MOJOR CLARK, C.O. OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CASTRO-MOTA v. BOBBY et al.
as 2:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA and SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant:
DAVID BOBBY, COUNSEL MASTER, COUNSEL HAAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CASTRO-MOTA v. MIESEL, ET AL
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant:
WARDEN DALE MIESEL, CO. and SUPERINTENDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CASTRO-MOTA v. SCHOPPE et al
as 2:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant:
WILLIAM SCHOPPE and C.O. OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos v. Novo Nordisk Inc., et al
as 2:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn Santos
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC., NOVO NORDISK US COMMERCIAL HOLDINGS INC., NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Santos Mota v. Warden Indiana County Jail, et al
as 24-1205
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA
Defendant:
WARDEN INDIANA COUNTY JAIL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUCKS COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Gustavo Diaz, et al v. FCA US LLC
as 24-1197
Plaintiff:
GUSTAVO DIAZ, JOSEPH SANTOS, CHRISTIAN A. GIBSON and others
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Santos v. Unknown Respondent
as 1:2024cv00182
Petitioner:
Andreuris Santos
Respondent:
Unknown Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
