Cases 31 - 40 of 80
Harman v. Schuylkill County Tax Claim Bureau
as 3:2017cv00623
Plaintiff:
James D. Harman
Defendant:
Schuylkill County Tax Claim Bureau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harman v. Tobash et al
as 3:2017cv00135
Plaintiff:
James D. Harman
Defendant:
Katrina J. Tobash and BB&T Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cianti v. Harman International Industries Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00046
Plaintiff:
John Cianti
Defendant:
Harman International Industries Inc., Dinesh Paliwal, Adriane Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
BROADWAY v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv02601
Plaintiff:
OMAR BROADWAY
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY M. LANIGAN, COUNTY OF ESSEX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerry Mobley, Jr. v. Lantz, et al
as 16-2168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERRY MOBLEY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
C.O. LANTZ, LT. MORRISON, CPT HARMAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Advanced Silicon Technologies, LLC v. Harmon International Industries Incorporated et al.
as 1:2015cv01173
Plaintiff:
Advanced Silicon Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Harman International Industries Incorporated, Harman Becker Automotive Systems, Inc. and Harman Becker Automotive Systems GmbH
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
HARMAN v. NORTHLAND GROUP, INC.
as 1:2015cv07523
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER HARMAN
Defendant:
NORTHLAND GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GAYLE v. RITTER et al
as 5:2015cv01828
Plaintiff:
WAYNE S. GAYLE
Defendant:
RITTER, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON, JOHN HARMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAYLE v. HARMAN et al
as 5:2015cv01827
Plaintiff:
WAYNE S. GAYLE
Defendant:
JOHN HARMAN, WORLY, JOSEPH KOSPIAH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
