Cases 31 - 40 of 6,589
RICHARDSON v. ALTEMUS et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
ANTWAN L. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
C.O. J. JONES, Lieutenant S. Woomer and JON ALTEMUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04008
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
CINDY JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
J.G. v. JONES
as 1:2024cv08232
Defendant:
TYLER JONES and TYLER JOHN JONES
Plaintiff:
J. G.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
POSEY v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 3:2024cv00175
Defendant:
MR. PEACOCK, MR. YOUNG, MR. QUICK and others
Plaintiff:
AJANI POSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Delaware Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00885
Defendant:
John Doe, Andrew Peruchi and Delaware Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Stevie A. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES et al v. RE MENTOR et al
as 1:2024cv08003
Plaintiff:
KAYLAN JONES and DAMON HOLMES
Defendant:
TAMMY BECKWITH, DAVID LINDHAL and RE MENTOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal--Other Contract
HOLMES et al v. RE MENTOR et al
as 2:2024cv08003
Plaintiff:
DAMON HOLMES and KAYLAN JONES
Defendant:
TAMMY BECKWITH, DAVID LINDHAL and RE MENTOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal--Other Contract
JONES v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03266
Plaintiff:
MARLIN JONES
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kevin Coit v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-2322
Defendant:
SGT HUNT, State Trooper, LT DIEHL, SUPERINTENDENT KLINEFIELDER and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
