Cases 31 - 40 of 211
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05488
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
BOONE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv05569
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, DESHAWN BEAUFORT and others
Plaintiff:
BOONE and LONNIE RANDOLPH BOONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL
as 2:2019cv00790
Defendant:
MARK HICE, HARRY CANCELMI, OFFICER JORDAN and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Randolph-Ali v. Commonwealth of PA
as 1:2019cv01073
Plaintiff:
Samira Randolph-Ali
Defendant:
Commonwealth of PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDOLPH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2019cv00846
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
MARY MARGARET RANDOLPH
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL
as 2:2019cv02731
Defendant:
MARK HICE, HARRY CANCELMI, T.A. LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv02231
Defendant:
SUPT. FERGUSON, SUPT. GILMORE, DEPUTY DIALASANDRO and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
M.M., Parent and Natural Guardian of C.C., a minor v. School District Of The City Of York et al
as 1:2019cv00623
Defendant:
Randolph Hernandez and School District Of The City Of York
Plaintiff:
M.M., Parent and Natural Guardian of C.C., a minor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERALES v. UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE et al
as 2:2019cv01430
Plaintiff:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES
Defendant:
WILLIAM CALLAHAN, GEORGE D. MULLIGAN, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDOLPH v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv20043
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., MCKESSON CORP and MERCK & CO INC
Plaintiff:
LINDA RANDOLPH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
