Cases 31 - 40 of 172
Miller v. Schmid et al
as 1:2022cv00958
Plaintiff:
Desiree Miller
Defendant:
Violet Schmid and Gerald Schmid
Purvenas Hayes v. Saltz Mongeluzzi & Bendesky P.C.
as 2:2022cv02268
Plaintiff:
Desiree Purvenas Hayes
Defendant:
Saltz Mongeluzzi & Bendesky P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Alequin et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00765
Plaintiff:
Harvey Alequin, Mark Allesandro, Debbra Allington and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
PURVENAS HAYES v. SALTZ, MONGELUZZI & BENDESKY, P.C.
as 2:2022cv02277
Plaintiff:
DESIREE PURVENAS HAYES
Defendant:
SALTZ, MONGELUZZI & BENDESKY, P.C. and Robert J Mongeluzzi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Forrest et al v. Thomas et al
as 2:2022cv01827
Plaintiff:
Desiree Forrest and Jose Cardona
Defendant:
Dale Thomas, William B Harrill and Harrill & Sons Trucking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
NICHOLAS v. THE HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
DESIREE NICHOLAS and DESIREE J. NICHOLAS
Defendant:
THE HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
DENT v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv20623
Plaintiff:
EMMALEE DENT
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARCUS HICKS, VICTORIA KUHN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DENT v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2021cv20623
Plaintiff:
EMMALEE DENT
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARCUS HICKS, VICTORIA KUHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
