Cases 31 - 40 of 143
Wilson Osorio, Jr. v. Detective Roger, et al
as 19-1862
Defendant / Appellee:
L. BILLERTER, SHIELD #51638, DETECTIVE ROGER, SHIELD #51890, B. SHULTZ, SHIELD #51512 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILSON ALBERT OSORIO, JR.
Casey Dooley v. John Wetzel, et al
as 19-1684
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CASEY DOOLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD GOSS, KEVIN KAUFMAN and JOHN E. WETZEL
MITCHELL v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 1:2019cv00358
Defendant:
Megan M. Dade, Mary Kate O'Neill, Gregory Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Paul F. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOSS v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv03252
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC., ASTRAZENECA LP, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN GOSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOSS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv16318
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
NATALIE GOSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Gildea et al
as 3:2018cv01527
Defendant:
P.A. Eric, P.A. Gonnes, CO Sposito and others
Plaintiff:
Gartor Kiki Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JUST v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2018cv01314
Defendant:
CO ENGLERT, COUNSELOR HECKMAN, CO RICHIE and others
Plaintiff:
JORDAN A. JUST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dooley v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2018cv01310
Plaintiff:
Casey Dooley
Defendant:
Kevin Kauffman, John E. Wetzel and Richard A. Goss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOSS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ET AL.
as 2:2018cv02706
Plaintiff:
PAUL GOSS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
