Cases 31 - 40 of 944
HARRISON-EL v. 1 JOHN DOE OFFICER et al
as 2:2023cv04364
Plaintiff:
ALI A. HARRISON-EL
Defendant:
1 JOHN DOE OFFICER, OFFICER TANNER and FALLS TOWNSHIP P.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASIANO v. COLUIN et al
as 2:2023cv21871
Plaintiff:
LEONA HARRISON CASIANO
Defendant:
MARLENE COLUIN and QUITIN PRIOLEAU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Harrison v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 1:2023cv01231
Plaintiff:
Randall Harrison
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
HARRISON v. KATSANOS et al
as 1:2023cv21433
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HARRISON, III
Defendant:
KAMERON KATSANOS and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
Rosado v. Rickard
as 3:2023cv01688
Petitioner:
Harrison Rosado
Respondent:
Warden Rickard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CASIANO v. LICATA et al
as 2:2023cv20877
Plaintiff:
LEONA HARRISON CASIANO
Defendant:
JOSEPH LICATA and WILLIAM CRAIGHEAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARRISON v. LIVERPOOL et al
as 2:2023cv03800
Plaintiff:
KEREEN HARRISON
Defendant:
JAMO LIVERPOOL, WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC., JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
HARRISON v. ACKER et al
as 1:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
JIHAAD AMORE HARRISON
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PETER C. ACKER and ATTORNEY JAMES REX BARNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON v. BURDINE
as 2:2023cv01628
Plaintiff:
TIM HARRISON
Defendant:
CARLOTTA BURDINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
CASIANO v. ADDISON et al
as 2:2023cv20011
Plaintiff:
LEONA HARRISON CASIANO
Defendant:
ELIJAH ADDISON, GLADYS JACOBS, THERESA STUBBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
