Cases 31 - 40 of 65
LYNCH v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv05128
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS J. LYNCH
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LYNCH v. THE CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2015cv03064
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. LYNCH
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILA., THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNA., THE PHILA. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JUSTE v. UPMC MERCY HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2015cv00169
Plaintiff:
ANDRE JUSTE
Defendant:
UPMC MERCY HOSPITAL, MELISSA, TONY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LYNCH v. THE CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2014cv04414
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. LYNCH
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILA., THE PHILA TRAFFIC COURT and THE PHILA PARKING AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Lynch, Sr. v. Vincent Fenerty, et al
as 12-2419
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN J. LYNCH, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
VINCENT FENERTY, JAMES HOCH, KAREN SCANLAN and others
LYNCH v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2011cv07520
Petitioner:
JOHN J LYNCH
Respondent:
LOUIS GIORLA, LENARD BEANER, 8TH FLOOR SUPERVISOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jeffrey Wiest, et al v. Thomas Lynch, et al
as 11-4257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY A. WIEST and LAURA E. WIEST
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. LYNCH, TERRENCE CURTIN, CHARLES POST and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03555
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
LYNCH v. DEMBE et al
as 2:2011cv03579
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. LYNCH, SR.
Defendant:
VINCENT FENERTY, JAMES HOCH, KAREN SCANLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LYNCH et al v. HILTON WORLDWIDE, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01362
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN A LYNCH and JAMES J. LYNCH
Defendant:
HILTON WORLDWIDE, INC. , JOHN DOE I-X and ABC COMPANY I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
