Cases 31 - 40 of 107
BROWN v. NEWELL et al
as 1:2018cv00377
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT BILL HARMON, JOHN DOES 1-2 and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JEFFERY NEWELL
Plaintiff:
LORI BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv04815
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LIEUTENANT BILL, POLICE OFFICER JOSEPH T. CARTER and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv13931
Defendant:
PEPPER, WILLIE BONDS, HIGGINS and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAZOJA v. NIELSEN et al
as 2:2018cv13113
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOES 1-2, KRISTJEN NIELSEN and others
Plaintiff:
REJHANE LAZOJA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114
Sonin v. Potope et al
as 3:2018cv01221
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Sonin
Defendant:
J. Potope, R. Parkyn, Elizabeth Stahl and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CONCEPCION v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2018cv09919
Plaintiff:
ALBERTO CONCEPCION
Defendant:
D. ORTIZ, BRINSON, J. DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Concepcion v. Ortiz et al
as 3:2018cv01103
Plaintiff:
Alberto Concepcion
Defendant:
D. Ortiz, Brinson, J. Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Remlinger v. Lebanon County et al
as 1:2018cv00984
Plaintiff:
Athena Remlinger
Defendant:
Lebanon County, Warden Robert J. Karnes, Lieutenants John Doe 1, 2 and 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FARRELL et al v. MICROBILT FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP et al
as 3:2018cv08851
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FARRELL and ROBERT SZOSTAK
Defendant:
MICROBILT FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP , PRINCETON ALTERNATIVE FUNDING, LLC , MICROBILT CORPORATION, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GAYDEN v. DIODATI et al
as 3:2018cv01101
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH A. GAYDEN
Defendant:
SERGEANT I DIODATI, NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, TROOPERS JOHN DOES (1 & 2) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
