Cases 31 - 40 of 115
SMITH v. SUPERINTENDENT MARSH et al
as 3:2018cv00164
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MARSH, RICKEY L. SHERMAN and SECURITY OFFICE
Plaintiff:
JAMES SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SMITH v. SCI BENNER et al
as 2:2018cv01032
Defendant:
SCI BENNER and RICKY L. SHERMAN
Plaintiff:
JAMES SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GASS v. MATTHEWS et al
as 2:2018cv02360
Plaintiff:
JERMAU GASS
Defendant:
ALVIN MATTHEWS, LORENDA HILL, CHERYL HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2018cv01134
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Theresa Delbaso, Bernedette Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 2:2018cv09783
Plaintiff:
Nina Adams , SHARON CONLEY , Pamela Digby and others
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES , ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP , ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. GRACIE et al
as 3:2018cv00098
Plaintiff:
JAMES SMITH
Defendant:
MATTHEW GRACIE and RAYMOND JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH et al v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS, L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv07858
Plaintiff:
GITA SMITH and JAMES SMITH
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS, L.P., ASTRAZENECA LP and MERCK & CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. LIT SINGER et al
as 1:2018cv00543
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
Lit Singer and Tammy Furgonsin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2018cv00044
Petitioner:
JAMES SMITH
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2018cv00036
Plaintiff:
JAMES SMITH
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and DA'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
