Cases 31 - 40 of 3,045
CALLAHAM v. PASSAIC COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00891
Plaintiff:
EDWARD CALLAHAM
Defendant:
PASSAIC COUNTY, PASSAIC COUNTY PROBATION, CHILD SUPPORT TITLE - IV-D AGENCY, MATTHEW JORDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Larry MarvelIn re: Larry Marvel
as 24-1216
Petitioner:
In re: LARRY D. MARVEL
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-CV-00690
as 3:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
MARK ZIEGENFUSS and MRZ BENEFIT, LLC
Defendant:
WHITEHORSE PARTNERS, LLC, CREATIVE BENEFITS GROUP, LLC, ROBERT SCARLATA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
PINNIX v. LIFECELL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
LARRY PINNIX
Defendant:
LIFECELL CORPORATION and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KAO et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
JOHN KAO and ANDREY GYUROV
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
KAO et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
JOHN KAO and ANDREY GYUROV
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH and others
WILSON et al v. MONGON et al
as 3:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Susan K. Wilson and Jessica Bruckner
Defendant:
THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH, HEATHER HOWLETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
BELLE v. RANSOM et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Petitioner:
SAMMY D. BELLE
Respondent:
KEVIN RANSOM, LARRY KRASHNER and MICHELLE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RUSH v. MONSANTO COMPANY
as 1:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
LARRY RUSH
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. BARLET
as 1:2024cv00006
Defendant:
LARRY JOHNSON and S BARLET
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
