Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MCSHANE v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2011cv07845
Plaintiff:
EDWIN MCSHANE
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCSHANE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv39604
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MCSHANE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Ronald Bricker v. Atty Gen PA, et al
as 10-4433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD L. BRICKER
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTY GEN PA, PATRICK S. CAWLEY, Deputy Att. Gen. of Pa., MARY L. FRIEDLINE and others
Bricker v. Corbett et al
as 1:2010cv01608
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Bricker
Defendant:
Thomas W. Corbett, Jr., Patrick S. Cawley, Mary Lynch Friedline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABDULLA v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71873
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MCSHANE
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCSHANE v. DONEGAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2010mc00080
Petitioner:
RICHARD MCSHANE, M.D.
Respondent:
DONEGAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Type:
Other Statutes
GOLDENBERG v. INDEL, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv05202
Plaintiff:
BORIS GOLDENBERG
Defendant:
INDEL, INC., AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, FSC SECURITIES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
MCSHANE v. MERCHANTS INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2009cv01003
Plaintiff:
SUZANNE M. MCSHANE
Defendant:
MERCHANTS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
MCSHANE et al v. ACANDS INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63552
Plaintiff:
PATRICK MCSHANE and PAULA MCSHANE
Defendant:
ACANDS INC., EASTERN REFRACTORIES, CO., INC., FLINTKOTE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
