Cases 31 - 40 of 8,705
MUHAMMAD v. ARMFIELD et al
as 2:2024cv02553
Respondent:
WILBUR JONES, JAMES ARMFIELD, JAMES CLACK and others
Petitioner:
WALID ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nicholas Edwards, et al v. J. Rivello, et al
as 24-2031
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS EDWARDS, LAEL BROWN, MUWSA GREEN and others
Defendant:
N. DAVIS, Medical Department Supervisor, A. WAKEFIELD, Facility Grievance Coordinator, GEORGE M. LITTLE, Secretary of Department of Correction and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06775
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06776
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06777
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. v. CUBE 3 STUDIO, LLC
as 2:2024cv02370
Defendant:
CUBE 3 STUDIO, LLC and CUBE
Plaintiff:
WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
WALLACE v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00152
Defendant:
IAN GUSTAFSON, STEPHEN HAGGERTY, COLBY HOLLIS and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00887
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
