Cases 31 - 40 of 2,144
PARKER v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2023cv21397
Plaintiff:
NYEDAIR PARKER
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, IAN LIBERTY, HONORABLE JUDGE SCOTT RUMANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PARKER v. LEE et al
as 2:2023cv03999
Plaintiff:
GORDON ROY PARKER
Defendant:
RONALD LEE, TERESA LEE, JEFFREY MAI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
SIMPKINS v. PARKER
as 1:2023cv20973
Plaintiff:
Ms. ANNETTE SIMPKINS and ANNETTE SIMPKINS
Defendant:
ROSALIND PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
USA v. Jonathan Parker
as 23-2822
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JONATHAN PARKER
USA v. Tyreese Parker
as 23-2823
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TYREESE PARKER
PARKER v. ROBINHOOD CYRPTO LLC
as 2:2023cv01737
Plaintiff:
JAQUAN PARKER and JA'QUAN PARKER
Defendant:
ROBINHOOD CYRPTO LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Grogan v. Reali et al
as 1:2023cv01099
Plaintiff:
Mary Grogan
Defendant:
Kenneth M. Reali, Mark L. Singleton, Gregory O. Anglum and others
Nominal Defendant:
Bioventus Inc.
John Miller v. Thomas Nelling, et al
as 23-2788
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN RYAN MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS NELLING, THOMAS GOGGIN, JOHN O'DONNELL and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH ELIAS, TRACEY LAWS, MITCHELL ROCK and others
Charles Jaramillo, et al v. City of Coatesville, et al
as 23-2700
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES JARAMILLO, FUEL CITY LLC, PA AUCTION CO, d/b/a "Bogey's" and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF COATESVILLE, LINDA LAVENDAR-NORRIS, CARMEN GREEN and others
COLON et al v. PARKER et al
as 2:2023cv03749
Plaintiff:
JULIAN COLON and JNJR PROPERTIES LLC
Defendant:
GREG PARKER, DANIELLE NIKKI PARKER, SUMMER JEFFERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
