Cases 31 - 40 of 75
Francisco Gonzalez v. Abigail Lopez-De Lasalle, et al
as 16-1025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCISCO GONZALEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ABIGAIL LOPEZ-DE LASALLE, M.D., DONNA ZICKEFOOSE, PRADIP PATEL, M.D. and others
Acosta et al v. Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, et al.
as 1:2015cv01024
Plaintiff:
Ronald Layne Smith, Ryan C. Rasmussen, Reginald J. Belton and others
Defendant:
Kellogg Brown & Root LLC, KBR, Inc., Halliburton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUFF v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv06582
Plaintiff:
JEROME N RUFF
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUFF v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv04628
Plaintiff:
REGINA RUFF
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BAYER CORPORATION, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SONAR PRODUCTIONS LLC v. RUFF RYDERS
as 2:2015cv02307
Plaintiff:
SONAR PRODUCTIONS LLC
Defendant:
RUFF RYDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WITHERSPOON v. RUFF RYDERS
as 2:2015cv00224
Plaintiff:
DESMOND WITHERSPOON
Defendant:
RUFF RYDERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MITCHELL v. 25TH DISTRICT POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2014cv07017
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MITCHELL
Defendant:
25TH DISTRICT POLICE DEPARTMENT and BRANDON RUFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONDORELLI v. TOWNSHIP OF VERONA
as 2:2014cv07349
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CONDORELLI , JOHN LECREUX, JOHN BALLANTYNE and others
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF VERONA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PARKER v. COHEN et al
as 1:2014cv06871
Plaintiff:
DONNELL PARKER
Defendant:
WARDEN COHEN, JOHN, TERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUFF v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv04940
Plaintiff:
BRANDON RUFF
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LONG, DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
