Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Geneva College, et al v. Secretary Department of Health, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-3536
Plaintiff - Appellee: GENEVA COLLEGE, WAYNE HEPLER, SENECA HARDWOOD LUMBER COMPANY INC and others
Defendant - Appellant: SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Geneva College, et al v. Secretary United States Depart, et al
as 13-2814
Plaintiff - Appellee: GENEVA COLLEGE, WAYNE HEPLER, SENECA HARDWOOD LUMBER COMPANY INC and others
Defendant - Appellant: SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
David Zubik, et al v. Secretary United States Depart, et al
as 13-1228
Plaintiff - Appellant: MOST REVEREND DAVID A. ZUBIK, BISHOP OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH as Trustee of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh, a Charitable Trust, ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH, CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH INC, an affiliate nonprofit corporation of The Roman Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh and others
Defendant - Appellee: SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Treasury, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Conestoga Wood Specialities C, et al v. Secretary United States Depart, et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1144
Plaintiff - Appellant: CONESTOGA WOOD SPECIALITIES CORPORATION, NORMAN HAHN, ANTHONY H. HAHN and others
Defendant - Appellee: SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Roy Langbord, et al v. United States Department of th, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-4574
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROY LANGBORD, DAVID LANGBORD and JOAN LANGBORD
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, US MINT, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Third Party - Appellee: TEN 1933 DOUBLE EAGLE GOLD PIECES
CONESTOGA WOOD SPECIALITIES CORPORATION et al v. SEBELIUS et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv06744
Plaintiff: CONESTOGA WOOD SPECIALITIES CORPORATION , NORMAN HAHN , NORMAN LEMAR HAHN and others
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS , HILDA SOLIS , TIMOTHY GEITHNER and others
Movant: THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 bb Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993
GENEVA COLLEGE v. SEBELIUS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00207
Plaintiff: GENEVA COLLEGE
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, HILDA SOLIS, TIMOTHY GEITHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
George Johnson v. USA, et al
as 12-1056
Plaintiff - Appellant: GEORGE C. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, JANE DOE 1-10 and others
CORDERO v. MILES et al
as 1:2011cv04176
Plaintiff: JOSE O. CORDERO
Defendant: GORDON C. MILES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Nicholas Purpura, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 11-2303
Plaintiff - Appellant: NICHOLAS PURPURA and DONALD R. LASTER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Individually and as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services., US DEPT HEALTH, TIMOTHY GEITHNER, Individually and as Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?