Cases 41 - 50 of 3,968
SEIF v. DORVAL TRANSPORT, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv07350
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, BHUPINDER NIJJAR, DORVAL TRANSPORT, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM SEIF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
SCHWAGER v. BEILEY et al
as 2:2024cv02570
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CHARLES SCHWAGER, CHASE SCHWAGER and ADAM CHARLES
Defendant:
MATTHEW BEILEY and AMER WILLIAM WHITFEAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sergei Kovalev v. Laboratory Corp of America Holdings, et al
as 24-2124
Defendant:
JANE DOE I, LABORATORY CORP OF AMERICA, also known as LABCORP, JANE DOE III and others
Plaintiff:
SERGEI KOVALEV
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02678
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 ra Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Eric Johnson, et al v. David Mazie, et al
as 24-2056
Defendant:
MAZIE SLATER KATZ & FREEMAN LLC, ADAM M. SLATER and DAVID A. MAZIE
Plaintiff:
ERIC JOHNSON
Carmelo Giuffre v. North American Spine LLC, et al
as 24-2073
Defendant:
NORTH AMERICAN SPINE LLC, PHD, S&D SURGICAL SYSTEMS INC, PHD, WILLIAM L. HIGH, MD, PHD and others
Plaintiff:
CARMELO JOHN GIUFFRE
Tiburcio v. ADAMS
as 5:2024cv02617
Petitioner:
Juan Tiburcio
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT MELINDA ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Soria et al v. Briningstool et al
as 1:2024cv00692
Defendant:
Tony Briningstool, Andy McQueen and John Rutledge
Plaintiff:
David Darrigan and Adam Soria
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
SHAH v. ADAMS
as 2:2024cv07010
Defendant:
RYAN ADAMS
Plaintiff:
PRATIK SHAH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
