Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Brown v. Chubbick et al
as 3:2012cv01638
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Defendant:
Jhyy Chubbick, John Adami, B. Tharp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ECK et al v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
as 3:2012cv00664
Plaintiff:
MARLENE ECK and RONNIE ECK
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WHITEFORD v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2012cv00055
Plaintiff:
JOHN K. WHITEFORD
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, MUNICIPALITY OF PENN HILLS , ANTHONY DELUCA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNYDER v. MEYER DARRAGH BUCKLER BEBENEK & ECK PLLC et al
as 2:2011cv01053
Plaintiff:
SHANNI SNYDER
Defendant:
MEYER DARRAGH BUCKLER BEBENEK & ECK PLLC and LEE R. DEMOSKY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1520
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ECKE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv40276
Plaintiff:
CARL L. ECKE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
ECKE v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv00063
Plaintiff:
DENISE MARIE ECKE
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ECK v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2009cv68278
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J. ECK, MATTHEW J. ECK, MATTHEW J. ECK and others
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, ACANDS INC, ACANDS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ECK v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2009cv68430
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J. ECK, MATTHEW J. ECK, MATTHEW J. ECK and others
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, ACANDS INC, ACANDS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WASILEWSKI et al v. KAISER VENTURES LLC
as 2:2009cv67108
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH WASILEWSKI, ELIZABETH WASILEWSKI, ALBERT J. WASILEWSKI and others
Defendant:
KAISER VENTURES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
