Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
COFFEY v. CAMERON et al
as 1:2015cv00138
Petitioner:
JEROME COFFEY
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JARVIS v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02904
Plaintiff:
CAROL COFFEY JARVIS
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON , C.R. BARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COFFEY et al v. ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv03276
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS S COFFEY and DAWN COFFEY
Defendant:
ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. and ZIMMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COFFEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv00231
Plaintiff:
JOHN COFFEY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RUBEN B. MORALES, M. ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COFFEY v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv03549
Plaintiff:
GLEN COFFEY
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STELTZ et al v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
as 2:2014cv02978
Plaintiff:
CARSON STELTZ , COREEN ALDOSA , STEVEN ALLAFI and others
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HOFFMAN v. EMANUELE et al
as 3:2013cv06936
Plaintiff:
LAUREN HOFFMAN
Defendant:
PHILIP EMANUELE, RICHARD H. COFFEY , THERESA HEALY and others
Cross_claimant:
LAWRENCE TYLER , DANIEL M. GUTHRIE , THE BOROUGH OF EATONTOWN NEW JERSEY and others
Cross_defendant:
PHILIP EMANUELE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COFFEY et al v. PFIZER, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv06353
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY COFFEY and JASON COFFEY
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC., PFIZER INTERNATIONAL LLC and J.B. ROERIG & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv06050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
