Cases 41 - 50 of 143
Rocmon Sanders v. Warden Sean Marler, et al
as 19-2153
Defendant / Appellee:
MEDICAL DEPT STAFF, F.D.C.- PHILA., CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., DIRECTOR, F.B.O.P., COMMISSARY DEPT STAFF, F.D.C. - PHILA. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROCMON L. SANDERS
SLOAN v. BOP
as 2:2019cv00227
Respondent:
BOP
Petitioner:
ALAN TODD SLOAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dorsey v. United States of America et al
as 3:2019cv00113
Defendant:
Case Manager A. Foura-White, Nurse K. Williams, Counselor Mark Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Dorsey, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Francisco Serrano v. Unknown BOP Employees
as 3:2018cv01866
Plaintiff:
Francisco Serrano
Defendant:
Unknown BOP employees and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AKWEI v. BOP et al
as 3:2018cv00189
Defendant:
BOPP, GEO INC, MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
THEOPHILUS AKWEI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LEWIS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2018cv13393
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MARK S INCH and ACTING DIRECTOR OF BOP
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrelonge v. Inch et al
as 3:2018cv01386
Defendant:
Associate Warden Mr. Gibson, Michael D Carvaljal, Several Unknown Excecutive Officers and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Gene Terrelonge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
VIOLETTE v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2017cv05030
Plaintiff:
GREGORY PAUL VIOLETTE
Defendant:
DAVID E. ORTIZ, GENERAL COUNSEL, FEDERAL BOP and US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Ernest Valentine
as 17-2253
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ERNEST VALENTINE, a/k/a BOP
Cabot v. F.B.O.P. et al
as 3:2017cv00710
Plaintiff:
Justin Cabot
Defendant:
F-BOP, U.S.P. Lewisburg, ., Edinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
