Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Toni Clark v. Jose Linares, et al
as 14-3647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONI CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSE L LINARES, Judge, JEROME B. SIMANDLE, Chief Judge and ANDREA WALKER, Deputy-In-Charge
CLARK v. USA. JUDGE LIARES et al
as 3:2013cv05484
Plaintiff:
TONI CLARK
Defendant:
JUDGE LINARES, CHIEF JUDGE SIMANDLE and ANDREA WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kamal Roy v. Supreme Court of US, et al
as 12-3365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAMAL KARNA ROY, For Sey and Volunteers Officer of Non Profit Conglomerate & Associations (17-1 Millions) In Number an Volunteer Fiducial Officer See Page1A For Details
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPREME COURT OF US, JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., Chief Judge, USA GOVT and others
REDFORD et al v. ABRUTYN et al
as 2:2011cv05130
Plaintiff:
SAPHYRE REDFORD, DANIELLE BITON and CHARLENE MICHELLE BITON
Defendant:
MORGAN MELHUISH ABRUTYN, ED DWECK, KATHLEEN CARLA ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bricker v. Corbett et al
as 1:2010cv01608
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Bricker
Defendant:
Thomas W. Corbett, Jr., Patrick S. Cawley, Mary Lynch Friedline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. Scirica et al
as 1:2010cv01041
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gibson
Defendant:
Chief Judge Scirica, Fischer, Pratter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nina Shahin v. Pamela Darling, et al
as 09-3298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NINA SHAHIN
Defendant - Appellee:
PAMELA A. DARLING, Justice of Peace Court #16 for Kent County, MERRILL TRADER, Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Kent County, ROSEMARY BEAUREGARD, Judge of the Court of Common Pleas Sussex County and others
Bricker v. Harlow et al
as 1:2009cv00582
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Bricker
Defendant:
Michael W. Harlow, Fred J. Ruffo, William Ayers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
William Rawls v. PA Dept Corr, et al
as 09-1583
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM RAWLS
Defendant - Appellee:
PA DEPT CORR, BD PROBATION PAROLE, JEFFREY BEARD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
