Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 62
In Re: Cosme Ordaz We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-4194
Defendant - Petitioner: In re: COSME OIDAC, AKA Cosme Ordaz
Plaintiff - Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent: LEGROME D DAVIS
Davis v. Arnold et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00587
Plaintiff: William D. Davis
Defendant: Todd M. Arnold, Edward V. Grynkewicz, III and Edwin R. Powell, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 2:2011cv07420
Plaintiff: SHAWN D. DAVIS
Defendant: JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
DAVIS v. ORGANON USA, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv02439
Plaintiff: DACIA D. DAVIS
Defendant: ORGANON USA, INC., ORGANON PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., ORGANON INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FISHER v. CUE et al
as 2:2011cv02545
Petitioner: OMAR FISHER
Respondent: CUE, LEGROME D. DAVIS and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00353
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
AZOULAY v. DUTCH MAID LOGISTICS, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00266
Plaintiff: MENAHEM M. AZOULAY
Defendant: DUTCH MAID LOGISTICS, INC., JOHN D. DAVIS and DEBRA D. DARDEN-MUNSELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. BUCKS COUNTY, PA
as 2:2010cv05944
Plaintiff: REGINALD D. DAVIS
Defendant: BUCKS COUNTY, PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Ralph Davi
as 10-4069
Petitioner: In re: RALPH D. DAVIS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent: WILLIAM J MARTINI
LIBEROW et al v. DUTCH MAID LOGISTICS, INC., et al
as 1:2010cv00154
Plaintiff: SHNEUR Z. LIBEROW , CHANA P. LIBEROW , DABRUSHA LIBEROW and others
Defendant: DUTCH MAID LOGISTICS, INC.,, JOHN D. DAVIS and DEBRA DARDEN-MUNSELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?